With Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts this week, chances increase that the Senate’s health care reform plan won’t succeed. And after Brown’s victory, Nancy Pelosi indicated that she doesn’t have the votes to pass her health care reform plan in the House. I’m not gonna lie, since this plan would open the door for expensive, inefficient, and inappropriate government control of health care and allow taxpayer dollars to fund abortion, I’m excited and relieved that it might fail!
Yes, I oppose government-run health care, believing that any decision to give government the power to mandate universal health coverage would likely lead to an inefficient single payer system and squelch the very competition necessary to drive down health care costs. At the same time, however, it’s clear that health care coverage is often contingent upon employment, costs are out of control, and we do need change; therefore, I support alternative reform ideas, such as expanded access to health savings accounts.
Regardless of my personal perspective on health care reform, it’s undeniable that health care is a hot button topic that won’t disappear any time soon. Hence, you and I, as Christians, need to consider our reasoning for the position we take on this issue.
On the one hand, if you support universal health care reform, have you thoughtfully determined that government-run health care will provide access to the highest quality treatment for the greatest number of people, or are you merely championing the trendy “solution,” which also feels the most compassionate?
On the other hand, if you oppose universal health care reform, have you taken time to proactively consider better alternatives? Are you concerned about the plight of those who need access to medical treatment, or are you focused solely on the cost and quality of your own care?
As these questions illustrate, health care reform is one of the many complicated “social justice” concerns to which Christians must apply biblical principles. In determining our position on the issue, we must wrestle with and reconcile divergent priorities such as the sanctity of human life, the proper role of government and community, individual liberty, and the Christian call to help those in need.
How do I reconcile contrasting principles? First of all, I don’t believe the government – with its inherent inefficiencies and inevitable tendency to push certain ideologies – is intended or able to address social welfare concerns with any long-term success. At the same time, however, this perspective in no way gives you and I, as believers, a cop-out card from our responsibility to help those in need. Rather, such a limited-government philosophy actually raises the stakes for Christian individuals and communities to step up and meet needs. Scripture unequivocally calls Christians to stand against injustice and to help those who are hurting; so, if I’m going to argue that the government shouldn’t redistribute wealth to meet needs, then I had better be investing my time and resources to serve those who are struggling around me.
The welfare and justice question for believers has never been if there’s a responsibility to take care of the poor and the sick, the fatherless and the widow; the question is who’s got that responsibility. I believe the answer is us – the body of Christ.
So, regardless of the outcome of the health care debate, and particularly if the bill goes down – which I hope it does – I have a responsibility to reach out to those who struggle without coverage. Whether I give financially to a clinic that is treating the uninsured or volunteer with an organization that is serving the community, I need to consider how I might better help those who are hurting.
Follow-up Question of the Day:
Is my political stance based upon biblical principles or partisan ideology? As Christians, we cannot allow partisan ideals or political parties to take precedence over biblical principles as the basis for our political perspective on any issue. Whether or not it was meant to apply to politics, I love Abraham Kuyper’s quote: “Do not bury our glorious orthodoxy in the treacherous pit of a spurious conservatism.”


